I have a question for you folks that might be familair with the federal court process. Is the Bolt decision the type to where it is such a sacred cow that it can never be challenged? If it can be...wouldn't the fact that the tribes probably get much more subsistence monies from casinos and other government programs be justification to overturn it? I think a well financed campaign that was based on bilogocal facts and the endangered specoes act, and basic sportfishing economics, would be the way to approach it. I would be willing to contribute to such an effort. Forgive me if I am stating the obvious too much...I am pretty new to the issue