Re: the boldt decision.

Most people make the mistake of assuming the law is about right and wrong. It has nothing to do with right and wrong in application it is about the process. The person that can make the best arguement with history wins the day.

So the interpretation of the treaties has gone one way basd on arguements of interpretation. Just need to come up with a Clarance Darrow for the pursuasive arguement to go the other way. Maybe the studies of Kenewick man will effect things. Who knows where it will come from and when. But it will come.