Yeah, I don't know that much about the Hood Canal streams, but kind of assume that they also fall into the Nisqually and Cedar category. We just don't really know why the runs won't rebuild on the Nasty and Cedar, despite draconian restrictions on harvest. Is this the case with the canal streams?

If so, I'm wondering if the underlying reason for lack of run resilience is some strange habitat thing that until solved, no amount supplementation will work. Hate to be so pessimistic, but look how quickly the Toutle recovered after a mountain blew it apart. This watershed was essentially destroyed by St. Helens, but 15-20 years later, it's got fish. Makes you wonder about the fact that the Toutle wasn't a recipient of a dam (unlike the Nasty,Cedar, or Skoke) or substantial agriculture/logging.