,



That goes both ways G2. It doesnt matter to me if your TU, WSC, PSA, BFD, or CYA. If the legal process says _ _ _ _, that's what you do.

If WSC is feeling picked on, they might consider what the reaction to thier actions will be, before they act. If thier position wont stand up to public scrutiny, it will never be accepted by the public. So if you're willing to wade into the water, you better know what your doing. You could be swept away.


That sounds like democracy to me. The whole point of which is to do what the majority want. An educated, informed majority because of a process called public disclosure. How would the majority accomplish that in this case?


My point is, as long as discriminating decisions are being made, the courts will continue to strike them down. If policies are created without following the rules, they will be rejected also.

How is that helping anyone?