Plunker:

I'm not wanting to be argumentative, but can you give some clarification on your comment, below:

"Has anyone considered that the landowners are probably the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe?"

If it was the Sauk-Suiattle Tribe, and the damage to the redds was as Jerry Garcia has suggested, then would they (Tribes) have any justification for doing the damage they did?

If it was the Tribe, would/should/could the Federal Government have any legal recourse for the damage done to these fish stocks?

I don't give a rip who did the damge, if it has seriously damaged the potential recovery of these fish then some action must take place in response.

Mike