I agree with Mike G.

The state needs to take a serious look back at how these splits were established and what politics were involved at the time.

Until recently, the sport anglers were too unorganized or apathetic to effectively participate in the decision making. That is no longer the case.

I would like to know by what reasoning the state figured that the lion's share of the non-tribal catch "belongs" to a few commercial crabbers instead of the citizens of the state.