So Plunker, just so I understand your position I have a couple questions. If the legislative process had been followed and the ban on wild steelhead retention had still passed what would your thoughts be? And if the moratorium had covered any and all fishing methods by any and all people, including tribes, what would your thoughts be?
Just curious.
If what is stated above in your post is true regarding legislative protocol then I agree that this was passed improperly but I don't think any of the sporties that really love the sport or resource want to give up any more, after all they are only left with hatchery fish now. Rescinding this ban will in many peoples minds be a step backwards for the fish, even though it may be proper political protocol.