Quote:
Phreak,

You just don't Phreakin' get it do you?

Let me spell it out one more time:

IRAQ DID NOT COMMIT THE 911 TERRORIST ATTACKS!

How many times does even Rumsfeld and GWB need to say it before it finally sinks in???
No one is saying Iraq was directly responsible for 911. But it is clear that Iraq has direct ties to terrorist activities, has funded, harbored, and trained terrorists. This guys aren't stupid for the most part. They know that as long as their hench men do the dirty work, they can claim they were not involved and know it will be hard for us to respond. If I wanted to attack america and not face the consequences, I would work with terror groups as they have done.

More evidence comes out every week. Here are some snips from a recent report:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“Important new information has come from Edward Jay Epstein about Mohammed Atta’s contacts with Iraqi intelligence. The Czechs have long maintained that Atta, leader of the 9/11 hijackers in the United States, met with Ahmed al-Ani, an Iraqi intelligence official, posted to the Iraqi embassy in Prague.”

“Prior to the 9/11 attacks, the Czechs were closely watching the Iraqi embassy. Al-Ani’s predecessor had defected to Britain in late 1998, and the Czechs (along with the British and Americans) learned that Baghdad had instructed him to bomb Radio Free Europe, headquartered in Prague, after RFE had begun a Radio Free Iraq service earlier that year.”

“starting with the first assault on New York’s World Trade Center, Iraq was working with Islamic militants to attack the United States”

“Evidence is “something that indicates,” according to Webster’s. Proof is “conclusive demonstration.” The report of a well-regarded allied intelligence service that a 9/11 hijacker appeared to have met with an Iraqi intelligence agent a few months before the attacks is certainly evidence of an Iraqi connection.”

“Following the February 26, 1993, bombing of the World Trade Center, senior officials in New York FBI, the lead investigative agency, believed that Iraq was involved. When Clinton launched a cruise missile attack on Iraqi intelligence headquarters in June 1993, saying publicly that the strike was punishment for Saddam’s attempt to kill former President Bush when he visited Kuwait in April, Clinton believed that the attack would also take care of the terrorism in New York, if New York FBI was correct.”

“But if the entire 1991 Gulf War did not deter Saddam for long, why should one cruise missile strike accomplish that aim? Indeed, the Iraqi plot against Radio Free Europe—the existence of which is confirmed by RFE officials—is clear demonstration that the June 1993 cruise missile strike did not permanently deter Saddam.”