But there is at least some factual basis...you admit yourself the issue aboulout the combat V. Its just interesting how we, as human beings, naturally look for what we want to see. Even while you agree with the error, you are quick to dismiss it as a "clerical error" and move on to say its "slime," while someone from the opposite spectrum would ignore the fact that the source is questionable and point out the error as of great significance. I personally am pretty indifferent as to his medals' status as I think we would be better served by looking at our candidates performances in the past ten years rather than thirty years ago. The only reason I am pointing these things out is because it is an interesting facet of politics, and human psychology.