Ernie Brannon was one of my favorite and best fisheries profs at UW. I respect him. Please understand that university profs are expected to do consulting work, and their papers and reports usually tilt toward the funding source. I don't think that comes as any surprise to most of you. I think what Dr. Brannon is doing is selectively pointing out examples of apparent - circumstantial evidence mostly, not scientific study - hatchery success in enhancing, restoring, or developing naturally reproducing populations.

He, or another fisheries expert, could also select examples where the results were negative, or even a complete disaster. In fact, I think he did once in Fisheries 401. So, you see, it's a mixed bag; therefore, it's wise to be critical and examine as much of the best information as possible.

Sincerely,

Salmo g.