Raking in more than 250K/year these days, huh BJ?

Read up. From liberal commie Rupert Murdoch's crew. Pay special attention to this bit-

"Obama's silence on taxes is a bit puzzling, because independent analyses of his plan compared with John McCain's well-advertised tax cuts show that the vast majority of Americans would be better off under Obama than McCain.
That bears repeating: Obama would cut taxes for ordinary people more than McCain would.
According to the Tax Policy Center's analysis of the two candidates' tax plans, 80% of taxpayers would get more from Obama's cuts than from McCain's. About 95% of taxpayers would pay lesunder Obama than under current law (which ends many of the tax breaks passed in the past decade)."

Read it yourself. http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/obama-missing-chance-campaign-tax/story.aspx?guid=%7B654C85A3%2DBA02%2D4DE8%2DBAB2%2D296135323425%7D

Copy and paste the URL.........it won't show as an active link.

I'm still not in Obama's camp. I'm yet to be convinced, but peddling BS is peddling BS, whoever the peddler. And it looks like this whole idea of your taxes going way up is BS unless you're raking down big bones.....and if you are, you'll pardon my sympathy meter not pegging.

I'm more interested in spending, and who is going to get a handle on that. Lately, it seems neither party has any interest in getting spending under control. Control the spending better, and the tax issue is more easily resolved. What was your plan........spend money on credit, and NOT pay it off?

Whoever gets elected is in for a tough job........finding a remedy for the idiocy of the Bush Administration. Trillions in additional debt to pay off, an energy crisis without any significant plan to adress it, a sluggish job market, a resurgance of the Taliban in Afghanistan while our troops are bogged down in Iraq, Osama Bin Laden still walking free........piles of trash everywhere for the next administration to attempt to clean up.

And there's BJ still polishing on GW's sack. Shocking.