nearly 240 looks and only 6 replys. not even pastor todd has chimed in, so far. i was told on sh.net that during the 1972 judge bolt now infamous decision. the indians actually only " requested 35% on the total fish as thier total take" judge bolt read into the treaty and read into how things were worded. he is the one who gave the indians the now law 50% total. they only needed 35% but was awarded 50% .....here is a true classic example of how things develope for the indians.

i've read many posts based on the CCA. the amount of replys by guys who say they won't support this group because the CCA does not address the indian gillnetting. well gee i wonder why that is???? the commercials are the only true opponents that we the whiteman can do something about. untill the guys meld thier minds around this, it will be a struggle.

for example, the indians along the columbia river are now threatning to shut down all the sport fishing. and they can! they are wanting to start thier fishing well below the bonni. they can! brewer fore sees some real ugly things brewing in the future. between the commercials, sportys and 2000 sealions in the lower river, we'll be lucky to see any spring salmon go over the bonni....