I'm not so sure I have ill feelings for the perp yet. It sounds like KRKO put up these transmitter towers and don't give a rat's ass about the interference it's having on everyone who lives nearby, and presumably occupied the area before KRKO installed the antennas. I'd be pissed if my phone, garage door openers, wireless security system, wifi, and maybe even TV cable didn't work at my house after the "neighbor" put up a powerful antenna. When it comes to property rights, KRKO's end at the edge of their property line, and the neighbor's begins at theirs. I think property rights includes the right of having the above mentioned equipment and services working properly on one's own property and not malfuntioning due to the effects caused by operations on the neighbor's (KRKO) property.

How's that for a property rights argument?

Sg