Problem is that they are basing their conclusions for the closure on bad science. Although for some, the objection is not totally based on emotions, but science as well.

First, there econcomic impact study is totally flawed. Dated and not a representative unbiased study of the econcomic impacts of local individuals. Should be redone so people truely know what the financial impact of this proposal will be.

Their science shows no clear indication that recreational fisherman are a direct link to orca declines. What are the db's assigned to a recreational fishing vessel? How does this db and 3 mph trolling effect a resident orca whale? If you claim adverse effects on orcas by boats, why do orcas approach recreational fishing vessles?

They are attempting to put a bandaid on a much larger problem they can't fully explain or are indirectly trying to fix: food source, toxins, etc.

Until they can prove scientifically, with direct research that recreational fisherman can and do cause a decline in orca populations, this is a bad Regulation.