From what I've been reading, it wouldn't bar folks who have previously received compensation from settlements, etc from receiving additional compensation for something they were already paid for.

It looks like an expensive piece of legislation meant to make people feel good. If it was something that would cover folks already not covered or compensated, I don't see an issue, but it looks like a duplication of coverage/benefits/settlements, etc. What I am still missing is a specific need.

Put a catchy name on it, make people feel sorry, and let an agency that has so far only managed grants manage this project? I think more critical thinking needs to be done by Congress and the American public. Maybe Santa will grant me that wish for Christmas?