Originally Posted By: AuntyM
Death is the kinder thing IMO. With a life sentence, he will have to be kept in solitary confinement to prevent being murdered by another inmate. I believe he'd be allowed reading, writing and religious materials and one hour of exercise per day, but he would be segregated for the rest of his life.

I agree.
He was paralyzed when he was finally taken down and life in prison, IMO, would be the best punishment. He would have a constant reminder of his high crime every day for the rest of his life.

His attack on his comrades was most heinous as he was a trusted associate of the victims. His weapon, an FN Five-seven, shoots a projectile designed to be a body armor penetrator. Premeditation of the highest degree.

My knee-jerk reaction to this crime is to give him the death penalty but life would be much worse in the case.

With him alive, maybe the criminal psychologists can poke/prod him and perhaps find a pattern where others like him can be intercepted before they do harm.
It does appear that signs/red flags were ignored.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Hood_shooting
_________________________
NO STEP ON SNEK