Originally Posted By: Sky-Guy
Originally Posted By: DBAppraiser
"Iran should be able to have as much nuclear material as they can sell and it isn't really any of our business who they sell it to" is his philosophy.


DBAppraiser, from what information are you basing your opinions on about Iran? What the mainstream media has told you, or what Israeli press has said? I'm genuinely curious...

Iran is not the most dangerous nation to possibly have nuclear energy, or arms in the region. Why should it be OK for North Korea, India or Pakistan, who have demonstrated their countries are far more fuggin nutz than Iran has?

Why shouldn't we leave Iran alone? To date, The IAEA has no solid proof that they have been developing nuclear weapons....All that BS is spin from mainstream media beholden to parrot anything their owners with an agenda tell them to.












I base my opinion on the words that have come out of Ron Paul's own mouth during debates and interviews. I paraphrased a bit but the overall theme is correct.

As for other countries such as Pakistan, India and N. Korea having these weapons, that horse has already left the barn. The Pakistanis have demonstrated that they will sell nuclear information as has N. Korea. So why should Iran be allowed to go the same path and arm Hezbollah and Hamas with these weapons? When the Iranian's say that their program is peaceful do you believe them? I don't. I also am not naive enough to think that the Russians, the Chinese, the Saudis, or the Pakistanis are our true allies and friends either.

THE WORST THING ABOUT RON PAUL IS THIS: HE MAKES ME AGREE WITH KK'S POST ABOVE. smile


Edited by DBAppraiser (12/21/11 06:44 PM)