We have just seen how much PAC money and attack ads can influence an election. Romney's PAC spent twice as much as Gingrich and spent it on really rough attack ads. The result was the decimation of Newt. The supremes say this is all legal, but is it what's good for America?

For those of you on the far right that tend to support the concept that money is free speech think about this - Obama will have roughly a billion dollars to spend. Do you want to see that spent attacking the Republican nominee? You can bet he watched what Romney did in Iowa and took notes.

IMHO we need publicly financed campaigns or some sort of limit on PAC spending.