Who is to say that tackling her and/or going hands-on wouldn't not have resulted in a similar or worse outcome.

Her injuries are a result of having hit her head on the pavement, not the tazer.

From a reasonable use of force standpoint, the officer acted entirely within clearly established legal guidelines for the application of reasonable force.

Injuries from having been tazed are often significantly less substantial than what result from going "hands-on."

The only thing I could find fault in is that it didn't appear as though anyone called for medical attention immediately, which should have happened based on the nature of the fall. They should have taken spinal precautions as well and not let her move around once on the ground.

Super sad situation and I feel terribly for everyone involved.