excellent post. I think you have to make some hard definitions to clearly state a purpose. I like the recovery moniker better than conservation....as you clearly state conservation should be part of any program. Harvest programs tend not to be used in recovery purposes because they may use weird broodstocks, but people will use roundabout wishy washy logic that they are keeping harvest off the natural stock, and are actually therefore conservation programs. Fine, but this is why conservation is a poor term, especially when you see its synonym: supplementation. I mean what is supplementation? Is is for supplementing harvest, or spawners, or both, or maybe mortality associated with habitat effects? Terms are extremely important as they evoke context, precision, and even emotion associated with people's interpretation of them. I like your suggested terminology.