AP, I agree...Ryley was wrong, but at least he tried to back up his thoughts with some sort of analysis.

It's all the guys...you know who you are...who were saying we would all be "surprised" when Romney won, that it would be a close one, but a win for Romney, that Romney was going to get 330 EC votes, that I was wrong (when I predicted very closely exactly what happened...the only state I missed was FL which I thought would be close, but Romney would win).

What those guys were basing their beliefs on is what I'm looking for.

Dick Morris, Rush Limbaugh, and Charles Krauthammer were all saying the same thing, only they were basing their statements on "the polling I've seen" (which strangely enough was not even remotely close) and that the pollsters were all lying to us to suppress the right wing vote (probably the biggest pile of schit comment ever made by any of those shittalkers)...so I'm also wondering how the guys here came to the same conclusions.

I'm guessing they just read what Krauthammer or Ollie had to say and substituted that for any kind of actual thought...which would be very true to form for most right wingers.

Fish on...

Todd