Hank and RvW. I'll try this again... Even though I'm sure YOU both actually understand what I was saying and are just willfully distorting it, I'll repeat the original text (a self C&P!) so you can read it again. Maybe it'll make more sense on second reading. Before you start, be sure you understand what an "analogy" is--because this is one:

Quote:
Nearly all governing results in taking what is inevitably a spectrum, and coding it into discrete groups. Do I believe people should be allowed to own weapons? Yes. Do I believe people should be allowed to own any weapon imaginable? Nope.

Let's take explosives as a counter example -- Somewhere between a firecracker and a 50 megaton hydrogen bomb is a line. We can debate its location, but there's a line.

Why is it so difficult to understand that a similar line is reasonable on guns?
_________________________
The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of what is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope. -John Buchan