Illahee's point is well-taken and Red-Hook proves it. Everyone agrees that guns shouldn't be in the "wrong hands" but who gets to make that call? Most of us would agree that Red Hook shows a continued pattern or questionable decisions and general lack of foresight. If he did something stupid with a gun and was involved in firearm accident that injured himself or someone else (I'm not implying maliciousness), none of us would be surprised and many would say that he probably shouldn't have had one to begin with.

Naturally, the person that is forced from being a gun owner (Red Hook in this case) is going to claim an invasion of their rights.