Understand the argument that folks don't want the alterations to the flows so that power can be generation. Keeping natural flows if you will.

Does that same concern/desire extend to the artificial passing of anadromous fish above the falls (all three). How does one argue that artificially passing anadromous fish above falls is OK but generating power is not? Seems to me it follows that keeping flows natural quickly leads one to the position that returning the fishing populations to the natural state of resident trout only (stop the truck and haul) quickly follows.

The trap and haul facility at Sunset falls is now more than 50 years old and has reached/is reaching the end of its practical life and is in need of serious upgrades. The power generation proposals I have seen include those trap and haul updates as part of the project.

Curt