Originally Posted By: blue water pro
[quote=willametteriveroutlaw][quote=blue water pro]

Read the reports about their clothes the only damage was Trayvon's hoodie, the string was pulled almost out, as if grabbed him from behind. No damage to Zimmermans cloths, not a tear, not a rip.


Anyways, won't change the die hards ideas. Yes, teenagers have killed people but why would you think this kid going out for candy, who without a doubt (via 911 call) ran from his attacker was a killer?


Your ideas aren't just a die hards ideas? Seems you're an expert because you watched the trial from your couch? How do you explain this?

Di Maio said that he had examined the autopsy, toxicology and photographic evidence and concluded that the evidence was consistent with Zimmerman’s statements to authorities that Martin was straddling him and that Zimmerman fired his gun with his right hand. The path of the bullet ran from Martin’s left side through part of his heart and into a portion of the right lung, Di Maio testified.

“The medical evidence ... is consistent with his statement,” Di Maio said of Zimmerman’s version of events.
Di Maio also testified that the hole in Martin’s shirt showed that the muzzle of Zimmerman’s gun was touching the clothing, and that the wound on Martin’s chest showed that his skin was two to four inches from the muzzle.
Di Maio said he based his conclusions on analysis of debris from the gunshot, including what he called “powder tattoo marks” surrounding the wound, which give the appearance of a reddish, circular rash on the skin. Such marks, he said, would not be present if the muzzle had been held against Martin’s skin.

“So … the muzzle of the gun was against the clothing. But the clothing itself had to be two to four inches away from the body at the time Mr. Martin was shot,” he said.

“This is consistent with Mr. Zimmerman’s account – that Mr. Martin was over him, leaning forward at the time he was shot,” Di Maio said.
_________________________
I swung, therefore, I was