In the indian debate I don't see how anyone can think that the indians "owned" all of the land in the state of Washington, I mean because they had a settlement next to a river somewhere does that mean they owned the entire river to it's headwaters, somewhere that they never set foot? I am totally into honoring treaties, even if the last fish is caught in an indian net. I have nothing but sympathy. Meanwhile all us liberal thinkers are giving them money, fish, sympathy, what's going on there on the Res? We are enablers. C
_________________________
Chuck