So with the mixed stock reality being what it is and apparently the driving force for reduced impacts in MA9 and 10 wouldn't increased plants in MA 8-2 tributaries lead to a conclusion that shifting recreational pressure into 8-2 (a more terminal fishery) would be a positive management action?

Or is there an ESA listed run of Chinook that is in worse shape than the Lake WA fish which, as I understand it, are the driving force for at least this year's reductions?
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!

It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)