My .02 idea probably wouldn't be popular. I've always advocated higher fees for salmon & steelhead specific tags, seperate from the reg license fee, if the extra fees would be clearly earmarked for fish enhancement. I would pay a substantial amount. Perhaps on a sliding scale such that the cost for low harvest would be less than for a fisher with a high harvest. This could generate much needed funds for such as hacheries and habitat improvement for nates. For all we spend on fishing I don't see how an extra $35/year for a low harvest or $70/year for a high harvest tag should make guys gag. And it might promote more C&R along with more fish, thus more fishing opportunity. - RT