I believe that that the bill defines "access" as where state lands abut the waterway so that one can fish from state land. A highway right of way may count, except that the bill has some sort of acreage basis. Which would mean that a road next to a stream would have too many acres to count but a bridge crossing would.

If WDFW is serious about surviving as a license-funded entity (perhaps even this is questionable) then they will need to address access for anglers and hunters.