I agree that the fish and waterfowl are sort of apples and oranges.

I believe that all fisheries should be terminal/extreme terminal. The region that does the spawning and rearing habitat protection should reap the benefits of harvest.

There was a recent clamor about BC proposing mining headwaters of transboundary streams. AK wants to harvest the production. On a purely economic basis, why should BC grow fish for AK? It should cost somebody to harvest the other guy's fish.