Coho, thanks for your insight. You being a fish biologist gives your post credibilty. The interpretion by the Fed.s sounds far more rediculous than the Judge Boldt treaty interpretation of "to be shared in common with" should mean 50% to a minority of people. It's ludicrous for the Indians to be given 100% of fish deemed harvestable via ESA guidelines!!! I think I just heard even Boldt roll over?