The real question for this thread should be along the lines of "Should ANY fundamentalist be President?"

Many folks in the US loudly oppose Sharia Law but want their interpretation of Biblical Law and somehow think the justifications are different.

An interesting historical fact is that the three major monotheistic religions grew out of each other. Judaism to Christianity followed by Islam; all having the same "founders". Of course, each of the three "majors" has a bewildering set of different groups that all use the same base texts. And yet, each group sees that they have the one true interpretation.