For the sake of discussion, on one hand, chambers fish have "less" impact on later run wild fish while if done right, broodstck fish in certain populations have been a success. For example, the Vedder River has used wild broodstck for decades and has been a shining example. Vedder River wild runs continue to be strong after years of using wb. Of course everyone's idea of success differs and this and this certainly not me personally making a case for either.

Just thought it was an interesting report that the chambers are being replaced with broodstck fish and wanted to share.