There is some truth to the idea that many folks don't know or understand WDFW's role and responsibilities. They are responsible for the management of all non-Indian fishing and hunting in WA, whether it is recreational or commercial. As such, they have to "balance" use among many stakeholders. It is complex, especially when one adds in the Tribes and their desires, which now actually trump a pure application of the Boldt Case 50:50 sharing. Further complicating the situation is ESA and how the Feds interpret that.

Having said that, WDFW tends be pretty secretive in their methods. As folks on here know, WDFW has difficulty in complying with the laws regarding rule-making, has difficulty in producing models that are computationally logical, and basically has issues with making sure stakeholders know what is going on. "Trust me" just doesn't work any more.

I believe that they are hamstrung by the tribes' influence in state and national politics. This about a whole lot more than just how fish and wildlife are shared. It is the old "follow the money" and WDFW is a situation where they simply can't win.