I am looking for the paper, but when looking for historical data on river flows for Muck Creek, it appeared to state that it historically has always had intermittent flows and that during a period in the mid 1950's or around then the flow was almost non-existent for a period. It was a very long technical paper and I was just skimming it, but that was what I drew out of it. What makes it funny is that when looking for it I came across the Muck Creek basin plan. The first section is a summary of the plan. It states that chapter 7 is about habitat and waterflow, but they appear to be missing and not addressed. The section phase of the plan has lots of technical data about water quality but not much in the way of a summary. The water flow data mentions a historical flow problem, but gives no historical data or context. Later it goes into a grant the tribe wants that blames it partially on tank crossings on the base. Makes me wonder, given that most of the money it looks like is being spent on habitat and stream flow why there is no historical data or information and why there is no summary on these in the main paper. I don't have the time to dig much deeper, but perhaps someone knows more about it. It almost looks like the data may not support the funding, but they do not want that information out there.