Oh he was right in 2012 and wrong a bunch of other times, so we should listen to him now? By that logic we should listen to Rich G because he was right in 2016 and ignore all the stuff Rich is wrong about.

Oh fivethirtyeight.com, a blog! Oh wow, amazing. Some guy posts on a blog! I'm impressed.

Nate Silver wanted Obama to win, so he said Obama was going to win. Libtards generally have magical thinking where they think if they say something enough times it will become true. Abracadabra! (Abracadabra is Hebrew for "I create as I speak" they are not lying, just creating reality). This is why libtards are so worried about what people say and have to censor everyone.

Todd said Obama was going to win and he had the exact same source as Nate Silver (they both pulled it out of their asses). Todd said Trump was going to lose and so did Nate Silver and they both pulled that out of their asses as well. Now If I'm going to listen to know nothing jackass spouting off partisan rhetoric they pulled out of their ass, I'd rather listen to Todd as he is occasionally entertaining and doesn't pretend that he didn't just pull it out of his own ass.

Nate Silver is a hack, you call tell by his explanations he doesn't understand the statistical concepts that he is talking about (either that or he is intentionally being deceptive). Fvck Nate Silver and fvck anyone dumb enough to think anything he has to say is valid, novel or interesting.