This Election is the one that the Military is going to use to show the American people the Extent of the Election Fraud and how its done... After Certification...

This will tie directly back to the 2020 Election and the unlawful certification of said election...

Election reform will not be done via this Legislative Branch,, what it will end up showing is that our entire government is corrupt,, serving without actually being legally elected,, that they have been knowingly certifying rigged elections... This will trickle down to the state and local level,, even the red states... They are all running the same fraud scheme..

No one is elected,, not even Trump,, Trump is a Military installed President,, we have been under a covert Military Government since 2016...

We have been working our way through a reset this entire time...

This WAR has been over the power to create and issue currency,, being taken from the Central Banking Cartel and returned to the individual nations...

To make it clear,, Trump is the peoples selection/choice but he is not elected...

Its a matter of legal definition under the legal principal of "Fruits Of The Poisonous Tree"

The Tree, its roots and fruit is all poison,, everything it touches is poison and invalid... Once this is openly known and accepted it can no longer stand as a legitimate body/representation under the US Constitution and Republic Of The United States...

We will end up in a situation of an Official Military Government under the 1949 Military government manual... Temporary,, until order can be restored and new elections can proceed...

I know this sounds far out there and impossible but wait and see...

Rich, what is far out there is believing that Trump is a militarily installed president. I have the respect and confidence that the US military is the most competent in the world. If they were going to install a president, I am confident that they would have chosen a competent person instead of Trump.

you may need to re think your capabilities of judgement and your gift of discernment...

its apparent in your being stuck in a belief that the system we are in actually works or even can work?

It's not actually the basic system that is the problem as its designed to work well,, what the problem is the introduction of the fiat/debt expansion part of it under the central bank model.. The Corporate model under a debt system,, it only works for a while due to currency devaluation and devaluation if the value of ones labor...

In 1964 minimum wage was $1.15 that is equal to about $50.00 per hour today... So our labor under progressive devaluation is worth 33.33 times less than it was at the end of the time Silver circulated as currency and all price points on all goods and services were relative to the value of Silver...

The debt model has facilitated a massive government expansion that has not done us any good compared to a higher labor value and low prices...

Our government model under debt expansion has facilitated bad Fish management and over harvest because of devalued currency and devalued labor... Basically bad management policy/practice because of Greed,, the needing to consume and expand more because of currency devaluation and debt to make up currency devaluation shortfalls to maintain a slow decline of quality of life and experience.. Slow enough as to not cause alarm and resistance from the people...

I'm reconsidering my comment about competence in the military. Defense Secretary Hegsesth - an incompetent moron if ever there was one - has fired some of the military's best talent, so overall competence within the US military system may be declining significantly. leaving the country at higher risk if an international conflict breaks out. Replacing talent with ass kissers does not bode well for our nation's security.

I think Uncle Joe Stalin tried to get an army of ass-kissers in the 30s. That didn't work well for them in the early 40s. Then, apparently, they went for competence rather than over ass-kissing.

SG I am a two tour combat vet by choice and frankly our soldiers have done okay in recent years. That said the rules of engagement and tactics particulary from Obama forward were wayyyyy past stupid. I had a good CO who drove home the purpose of the military is kill maim and destroy in defense of or in the name of the american people. Nothing else mattered and his stated objective was what I said with this addition. " To get us all home alive" . Once after a situation that we did not know how to deal with he said " when in doubt shoot we will sort it out later " Combat is ugly keeping our people alive and killing the oposition without remorse is required.

I hate war it serves no rational purpose but if you have to fight then you kill the SOB's not run around worrying about perception or how the oposition feels. My CO said one other thing that stuck." When up against a foe who is willing to die for his cause, talking is of no use you simply help him achieve that goal"

That is how you fight a war.

RG, I was reading a book about the Navy in the Pacific and how they figured out supply lines and then carried the war to Japan. What actually scared me was that "the foe was willing to die for his cause" caused the US to consider poison gas on Iwo and then for the invasion of the home islands. If the Japanese people and soldiers were simply willing to die and not surrender then why not? The US didn't, but that ethical question remains.

Rivrguy,

I don't disagree with your assessment of the role or purpose of armed conflict. (To quote General George Patton, "No one won a war by dying for his country; you win a war by making the opposing SOB die for his country.") My comments above are directed at the current administration and its deleterious effect on the armed services. The military, like all federal employees, take an oath to the US Constitution, not to any particular leader. Unfortunately for the US, the current president demands loyalty to him over and above loyalty to the Constitution. That is un-American, and that is my complaint.

Conservatives are generally more consistent with following the constitution than Democrats or progressives. Trump more closely aligns with the constitution than any recent Democratic candidates have.


Streamer

SG there are those who serve and those who choose not to but we take the oath for sure but few fight for that in a real sense. To say the troops who fight in wars is about the constitution is a real reach. Most fight for the nation but a better way to say it is the american people. When [Bleeeeep!] flies you fight for your guys your unit just so all survive. In my three years of service after being sworn in never did I hear fight for the constitution. For country, for freedom, against communism to keep the world safe ( which was a true load of BS ) many things but never the that piece of paper. The ideals in it yes but never the political views many attached to it. A picture of the president is in every units head quarters as the president is the cammander in chief. From the bottom to the top you follow the chain of command and in Nam Westmoreland missed it. Stormin Norman got it right Iraq as did Jack Keane later but always this american values are not those of most of the world. Those who serve do get it and soldiers pray thier leader gets does also. We have had a series of presidents who put our troops in harms way fighting foolish wars for what? The present one seems to hate war and in my view is to hate war is far better than send our kids to get thier bodies blown to bits for nothing.

In the end SG you might be right but at the moment I think not. Spending billions of $$ and thousands of lives is the way many administrations of both parties have operated. I am up to letting a new approach be tried and retiring those who think the only way to do things is getting our kids killed. Time to try something different.