#133444 - 01/03/02 11:02 PM
MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
From the 'Super Lines ...' thread came an idea to have a member's line test thread, to last for a while for definitive results. Coot and others with the equipment can give us results of diameter measurements, and many others (including River Man and Sniggler) can do comparison pull tests or weight tests for strength comparison. We would appreciate any test input from members, as we can all benefit a lot from consensus results!!! Comments on river casting/handling of these lines will be valuable to add to these test results. Some line suggestions for test candidates. Add your's also. .... Super Braids: - Power Pro - Fireline - Tuf Line - Others? (add your's below) Monofiliment: - Maxima; Chameleon and Ultra Green (Perfection?) - Berkley; XT, Big Game, XL - Izorline; Platinum - Ande; Tournament Green - Fluoralcarbon leaders? - Others? (add your's) I will add that in addition to diameter and pull/weight tests of new lines, that we also compare braids that have been used a few weeks to the exact same line new; as River Man aluded to. I would expect the new line to be stronger, but not much stronger. Using a tester or weights should be more informative than direct line to line break off tests against used lines, because the one that breaks could be almost as strong, or not near as strong; but difficult to tell which in that scenario. Also I'll mention that I have used 30 lb. Tuf lines for years and have older ones that consistently survived a hook snag pull out when 25 lb. Maxima leader broke at the same swivel; even survived a number of Maxima breaks against the same Tuf line knot (lazy to re-tie - Of course it was 30 vs 25, but impressive braid performance). This was during Tillamook tidewater tug-o-wars with big Kings in snaggy areas, where I haven't fished for a couple seasons. But I haven't had the Power Pro braid I've been using long enough to see if it endures like that too. Thanks guys for any help or other ideas. RT [ 01-03-2002: Message edited by: RT ]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133445 - 01/03/02 11:17 PM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Spawner
Registered: 10/29/01
Posts: 561
Loc: Kenmore, WA
|
maxima crystal ivory. i think its a little more limp than the other maxima. tyler
_________________________
All Americans believe that they are born Fishermen. For a man to admit a distaste for fishing would be like denouncing mother-love and hating moonlight. -John Steinbeck
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133447 - 01/03/02 11:41 PM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6424
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
I'd like to see the stren extra strength tested, it's the only line I'll use on spinning rods. Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133448 - 01/04/02 12:16 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Spawner
Registered: 09/25/01
Posts: 768
Loc: Tacoma
|
How about McCoy green in 8# & 10# test?
FJ...out
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133449 - 01/04/02 01:14 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 03/05/00
Posts: 1092
|
I have found that the manufactures play alot of games with the diameter and #test specs they print on the packaging. How many people really measure the thickness or do any breaking tests? Even if tests are performed,they are usually very unscientific. Maxima ultra green is a very popular line and I have to agree it is one of the best, but if you measure it you will find it is larger in diameter than the package states and the stated diameter is larger than most other lines of the same #test. Of couse this will give the impression that it is stronger/better than the others. For me the real test of a line is not only the strenght/diameter ratio,but based on my impression of how the line holds up to actual fishing conditions over a period of time. Does it seem to lose all its strenth after breaking off snags? Does it have good knot strenth with knots that can be tied when your fingers are frozen? Does the line break at the first unseen nick? Does it hold up to pulling a fish around a snag. Is it stiff , have alot of memory or come off the reel bad? These are all things I take note of when deciding which line is best. They are all mostly opinion so what works for me might be crap for others. Also a good line for one type of fishing might be crap for some other type of gear. The line I like best for the river fishing I do at this time is Yo-zuri camo green(mono). It has excellent strength to diameter ratio,very abrasion resistant and has taken all the abuse I have given it with no problems. Really good line. For the salt, trolling jigging mooching I like Power pro with yo-zuri leader.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133450 - 01/04/02 11:18 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 117
Loc: St. Helens, OR
|
I'll second the stren Extra strength. I was a little skeptical at first about it. I don't think it's quite #16 test (for 10lb Dia.) but it will go against 12lb. ultra green in a break test.
Also, stren magnathin is dynamite on spinning reels. Nice small dia, and good breaking strength. I heard a rumor that they have quit making this. Bummer.
Aaron
_________________________
Save the drama for your mama and...................FISH!!!!!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133451 - 01/04/02 11:21 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Juvenille at Sea
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 117
Loc: St. Helens, OR
|
I'll second the stren Extra strength. I was a little skeptical at first about it. I don't think it's quite #16 test (for 10lb Dia.) but it will go against 12lb. ultra green in a break test.
Also, stren magnathin is dynamite on spinning reels. Nice small dia, and good breaking strength. I heard a rumor that they have quit making this. Bummer.
Aaron
_________________________
Save the drama for your mama and...................FISH!!!!!!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133452 - 01/04/02 01:44 PM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/07/00
Posts: 3009
Loc: Lynnwood, WA
|
I personally have had good results with Ande. I tried a spool of Izorline Platinum this winter, and was very impressed as well. I usually run 12# main-line, 10# leader for most winter fishing applications. I've never had a problem with line-shy fish and rarely, if ever, lose a fish to a main-line failure.
_________________________
A day late and a dollar short...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133453 - 01/04/02 07:26 PM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 12/06/00
Posts: 487
Loc: oregon
|
Hey RT and others,
It's great to see the enthusiasm for the line tests. I hope that if we are going to do this, we do it right. All of us recognize that there are personal preferences for various types of fishing situations. Any test, however, can only measure so many variables. And, the data will only be as valuable as the test. As much as possible, it's important to remove all bias. Following are a few ideas I have for the test, others may have additional ideas to reduce error.
1. A qualified scale would likely be the most consistent method of measure; a "pull test" with a swivel between lines would be an alternative;
2. Each line and or pull test between lines should be conducted three or more times to reduce error as a result of poor knot or line construction.
3. Line diameter in addition to line poundage will be part of data, some lines are far larger in diameter but have same poundage rating, maxima being a good example;
3. Tests should be conducted on both new and used lines. Used lines should in some way best approximate "real-life" wear but also be consistent from one line to another. The point being that each "used" line must be "used" the same amount to provide a fair comparison. Control for this test will be difficult due to the variation in fishing approach (bobber, plug, bottom), weather conditions, gear type, substrate type, etc., all of which effect the amount of line wear.
4. Several tests with each line could be done. For example: new mono vs new mono, new super vs new super, used mono vs used super.
5. Consistency regarding "knot" type should be used for each line type and test. For example, improved clinch for mono, palomar for super lines.
A qualified and accurate scale would be most helpful, perhaps someone has an idea for this. If not, perhaps several of us could test the popular brands using the pull test and provide them to the group in table form. Any ideas?
RM
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133455 - 01/05/02 01:06 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Good ideas RM. If some of us do some tests the best we can get to and post the results here, they will give credence or not to the published tests that fp has. Posting that would be great FP! Someone with a fax, scanner, and ability to convert it to a post in this BB, pleawse help. Thanks. Then the guys can have at it , with friendly debate about line preformance. ... Member Coot is a very knowledgable guy; I think with engineering background. He e-mailed me some testing ideas to get more accurate definitive results. But it may be too complicated? Maybe Bud (Coot) will post those ideas here if anyone wants to pursue them. ... Any tests or river experiences you guys would post about here should help us all to better pick a line suitable to our fishing style and specific and rivers. EDIT: In the other 'Superbraid lines ....' thread, John Hookem posted about an extensive line test to access (published in Sportfishing mag and their website: John Lee Hookum posted 01-04-2002 07:10pm There is good news. A scientic testing of 85 lines rated "20 pounds" has been completed. Its is posted in the October issue of Sports Fishing magazine.( www.sportsfishingmag.com) It compares the 1.( Tensile & Abrasion) combined rating,2. (Tensile-Strength) rating, and 3.(Abrasion-Strength rating. It also give the (Mean Wet Break Strength. This is a very detailed a well presented study. The article is by Doug Olander. I have the 9 page report if someone wants a copy. To get a copy just E-maill me and I will get it to you for cost of copying and postage." E-mail John for copies - or access the test online. --------------- [ 01-04-2002: Message edited by: RT ]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133456 - 01/05/02 01:20 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 10/12/01
Posts: 2505
Loc: Area 51
|
Be sure to check out Sport Fishing Magazine. The october 2001 issue. It has all of the mono and braided lines evaluated. This is done scientifically. I have a copy of the report. It is 9 pages long. It is presented with gragh to show and compare over 85 lines for 1.(combined rating Tensil & Abrasion)2. (Tensile-Strenth Rating) 3. (Abrasion-Strength Rating)4.(Mean Wet Break Strength) If you would like a copy E-mail me. I can send for cost of copies and postage.
_________________________
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods. -- Albert Einstein
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#133457 - 01/05/02 07:18 AM
Re: MEMBER'S LINE TESTS
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 12/06/00
Posts: 487
Loc: oregon
|
Hey it sounds like to me from the posts above that the test has already been done in a good way. I would love to have a complete copy of this, sure others would as well. I hope that the test didn't have private interest. Some I have read in the past had obvious bias for the line company sponsoring the test. Would it be possible to create a link for it here? Cold outside here guys, the rivers are steelie greeeeeen.
RM
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1016
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11498 Members
16 Forums
63778 Topics
645358 Posts
Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM
|
|
|