Check

 

Defiance Boats!

LURECHARGE!

THE PP OUTDOOR FORUMS

Kast Gear!

Power Pro Shimano Reels G Loomis Rods

  Willie boats! Puffballs!

 

Three Rivers Marine

 

 
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#432700 - 05/05/08 12:59 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: ]
stlhdr1 Offline
BUCK NASTY!!

Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6424
Loc: Vancouver, WA
 Originally Posted By: AuntyM
 Originally Posted By: Steelheadman
 Originally Posted By: AuntyM
Yesterdays count was 6340 with 236 jacks.

So if it's all ocean conditions and there isn't enough food in the ocean because of it, how smart is it to use the "ocean" for a salmon ranch like some of you keep proposing?

How smart is it to keep removing the biomass that salmon feed on? Maybe putting millions and millions of hatchery fish out there to compete with the wild fish we're trying to recover isn't such a smart idea after all.

If hatcheries only yield great returns when the ocean conditions are good, and contribute to wild/native declines when it's bad... it's not too hard to draw a $25 expert conclusion.


Another way of looking at it is that each hatchery raised fish in the ocean is food for another preditor up the food chain. If that hatchery raised fish wasn't there and there wasn't another food source, then the wild fish gets eaten instead.


the bulk of hatchery production is to support commercial harvests, then tribal harvests. Sport fishers are an afterthought, but they are also the biggest enablers and financers of this broken system.


That's exactly why I won't support CCA.

They take away the nets overall, what's the point of hatchery fish?
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.


Top
#432729 - 05/05/08 02:20 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: stlhdr1]
laterun Offline
Repeat Spawner

Registered: 10/09/04
Posts: 1027
Loc: Napavine,Washington
It seems as though stopping or greatly curtailing the hatchery programs now is a very poor idea. On most streams with hatcheries it should be relatively easy to install a barrier to make it impossible for any hatchery fish to go any futher upstream. By stopping the clipped fish AND calling for a 100% clipping of all hatchery origin fish on those streams would be a good place to start. It would not cost that much to implement the installation of the barriers and I'm sure some of the sports groups would be willing to help and donate materials to make it happen. I am a very big supporter of the hatchery releases as I believe our chances to catch and retain fish (salmon/steelhead) will depend on the hatcheries in the near future. Until they come up with a 100% clipping program, we will continue to release inferior fish back into the mix unwillingly causing harm or potential harm to the wild stocks that may or may not exist on these streams.

Top
#432798 - 05/05/08 06:29 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: ]
stlhdr1 Offline
BUCK NASTY!!

Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6424
Loc: Vancouver, WA
 Originally Posted By: AuntyM
 Quote:
That's exactly why I won't support CCA.

They take away the nets overall, what's the point of hatchery fish?


What CCA is proposing is "selective" commercial harvest, not an end to commercial harvest.

If you like gillnets Keith, then you probably shouldn't support CCA. Of course, the big winter steelhead you like to catch will fall victim to the gillnetters. Maybe you don't mind the net marks, infections and premature death?


Please don't try and turn my words... I've said it time and again that I don't like commercial harvest and bycatch. I'm just a bit nervous about taking commercial fisherman from the Columbia river as that will be one major reason for less hatchery fish.........

It's proven that Gillnets cannot be selective enough, if they could they would be already......

Keith
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.


Top
#436735 - 06/01/08 03:30 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: ]
Todd Offline
Dick Nipples

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 28170
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
For those of you who are concerned about the issues surrounding competition between wild and hatchery fish of the same, or of different species, a new paper synthesizing all the past science that supports virtually every single one of my points above in this thread on the issue, and comes up with some possible solutions, has been written.

I posted its availability on another thread...

http://www.piscatorialpursuits.com/forum...atch#Post436630

Fish on...

Todd
_________________________


Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle


Top
#438018 - 06/07/08 01:39 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: Todd]
Todd Offline
Dick Nipples

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 28170
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
Total run size is still shy of 160K...

Fish on...

Todd
_________________________


Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle


Top
#438047 - 06/07/08 07:59 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: Todd]
eyeFISH Offline
Ornamental Rice Bowl

Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 12767
Not quite, T-Rip.

Thru June 6, and with 9 more days of "fuzzy" counting left to go, there's a total of 152.4K (adult plus jack) springers over the dam. Add back 20K sport harvest and 6K gillnet harvest below the dam, then another 1K (actually slightly less) in paper C&R mortalities.... and you get about 181.2K which is right about where the second run-size downgrade by the CRC predicted we would be.... 269K ---> 200K ---> 180K.

If you figure in another 3% pinniped predation below the dam... add in another 5K fish... that makes about 186.2K springers that crossed the CR bar, which is the deadline for the preseason forecast.

So at this point, the preseason forecast missed the number by about 83K.... or about as big last year's entire run-size.

In relative terms they over-predicted the run by 45%.

I'm sure glad my accountant doesn't forecast my business revenue like that!
_________________________
"Let every angler who loves to fish think what it would mean to him to find the fish were gone." (Zane Grey)

"If you don't kill them, they will spawn." (Carcassman)


The Keen Eye MD
Long Live the Kings!

Top
#438049 - 06/07/08 08:13 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: eyeFISH]
Todd Offline
Dick Nipples

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 28170
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
Thanks for the correction...I completely left out the harvested fish.

Fish on...

Todd
_________________________


Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle


Top
#438066 - 06/07/08 10:04 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: Todd]
McMahon Offline
Spawner

Registered: 05/27/08
Posts: 652
Loc: Bellingham/Socialistic Idaho
Not to pick a fight, but I really wish people would stop complaining about the fishery managers coming up with bad return "forecasts." Bios cannot control how many fish return despite what many of you seem to think. They're mere mortals.

Return predictions are created by models that incorporate many variables. If one of these variables is whacked out, then the predicted numbers will be wrong. A biologist cannot control how much prey will be available to salmon and steelhead in the oceans. A few people have brought up starving fish. There are some indications that we are on the "bottom" of the natural nutrient cycle. Many studies have been made on nutrient cycling off of coasts, and it has been found that poor nutrient upwelling leads to poor fish stocks. Biologists cannot control this.

People can make bad predictions. Wheatherman do it every day in my area. They're right about 10% of the time. Doctors make bad prescriptions that kill people, or give bad predictions on when someone with a terminal disease will pass away. Stock brokers make bad predictions and lose people millions of dollars.

It happens.

Top
#438067 - 06/07/08 10:07 PM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: McMahon]
Todd Offline
Dick Nipples

Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 28170
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
The Bonnie cam has been showing fish almost every time I look at it today...shad and salmon both.

Fish on...

Todd
_________________________


Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle


Top
#438094 - 06/08/08 12:44 AM Re: Poor returns call for an answer [Re: Todd]
Stalmass Offline
Juvenile at Sea

Registered: 08/26/04
Posts: 140
Loc: Selah, WA
Lots of Summers (June Hogs) crossing Bonne now. Look at the PIT Tag reports on the DART.

Top
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4

Search

Site Links
Home
Our Washington Fishing
Our Alaska Fishing
Reports
Rates
Contact Us
About Us
Recipes
Photos / Videos
Visit us on Facebook
Today's Birthdays
Schmidtm, schmidty, Spinhead
Recent Gallery Pix
hatchery steelhead
Hatchery Releases into the Pacific and Harvest
Who's Online
0 registered (), 392 Guests and 2 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
John Boob, Lawrence, I'm Still RichG, feyt, Freezeout
11498 Registered Users
Top Posters
Todd 28170
Dan S. 17149
Sol Duc 16138
The Moderator 14486
Salmo g. 13526
eyeFISH 12767
STRIKE ZONE 12107
Dogfish 10979
ParaLeaks 10513
Jerry Garcia 9160
Forum Stats
11498 Members
16 Forums
63781 Topics
645410 Posts

Max Online: 3001 @ 01/28/20 02:48 PM

Join the PP forums.

It's quick, easy, and always free!

Working for the fish and our future fishing opportunities:

The Wild Steelhead Coalition

The Photo & Video Gallery. Nearly 1200 images from our fishing trips! Tips, techniques, live weight calculator & more in the Fishing Resource Center. The time is now to get prime dates for 2018 Olympic Peninsula Winter Steelhead , don't miss out!.

| HOME | ALASKA FISHING | WASHINGTON FISHING | RIVER REPORTS | FORUMS | FISHING RESOURCE CENTER | CHARTER RATES | CONTACT US | WHAT ABOUT BOB? | PHOTO & VIDEO GALLERY | LEARN ABOUT THE FISH | RECIPES | SITE HELP & FAQ |