#50233 - 02/27/01 05:00 PM
Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I have heard that the Lamiglas certified pro series is as good as the G.Loomis GL3,and almost as good as the IMX series of G. Loomis. I am in the market for a 8'6" and willing to spend the money. I already have an IMX Loomis model (love it) but was wondering how the certified pro series compares.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50234 - 02/28/01 12:13 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
BUCK NASTY!!
Registered: 01/26/00
Posts: 6312
Loc: Vancouver, WA
|
Don't bother, whoever is saying that hasn't got a clue. Stick with Loomis, they are second to none.
------------------
_________________________
It's time to put the red rubber nose away, clown seasons over.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50235 - 02/28/01 12:21 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Spawner
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 889
Loc: Tenino, wa U.S.A.
|
it's like asking what is better Chevy or dodge. go with Loomis and Chevy!!
dcrzfitter
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50236 - 02/28/01 11:01 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Spawner
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 621
Loc: Coos Bay, OR
|
I am very fortunate to be able to fish dozens and dozens of different rods each year and build hundreds more. I really like the Lamiglas Cert. Pro, they are very pretty rod (much prettier than Loomis)and they have great actions in most of the rods I have fished. I really like the 9'6" 6-15 Cert. Pro. However... If I were in the market for a new rod and money wasn't the issue, it would be a Loomis. Loomis build a lighter,stronger, straigher rod. Bottomline. The GL3 is lighter than the Cert. Pro. it is stronger (we do much more warranty work on Lamiglas rods than we do Loomis, and we sell more Loomis rods.) and the Loomis blanks are straighter for the mst part than Lamiglas. Now most people don't look that carefully to the blank and guide placement and guide wraps when they buy a factory rod, or they would never buy one  but Loomis builds a better factory rod than Lamiglas. We build a much better rod than both of the,!  I do not work for either company! Thanks for letting me play! TH www.thcustomrods.com
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50237 - 03/02/01 05:54 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Captain C/22 - Team Stay Up Right!
Registered: 01/13/00
Posts: 4194
Loc: Hurricane Ridge , Wa.
|
3-R, as to Certifified Pro as good as GL-3 ya. Imx- ya 2 ya. I'd rate my Big Stick "C.P. X 90 HCT 9 footer rated @ 10-30" as better than any Imx I've fished. Good balance with curado-200 20 lb. main & 15 ultragreen leader's. Light tip & ton's of backbone for Salmon and Nate's. On top of it all it look's so good! Golden- tone blank that remind's me of brandy at sunset. Also A great Mexico rod, kick's butt on yellow tail's/ small to med. rosterfish & yellow-fin Tuna. And you thought a 40 Lb. King was tough!
_________________________
Apocalypse Steelheader. Chucking gear as the end draws near.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50238 - 03/04/01 06:54 PM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Eyed Egg
Registered: 03/04/01
Posts: 5
|
loomis rods are in general a better built rod, however for the money depending on what you are fishing for either rod will suffice, I've got an LHS s86mhct 10-20 up for sale, wich i feel for the money is as good if not more so better for the price, if you are interested e-mail is jwarter@msn.com
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50239 - 03/13/01 06:18 PM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Egg
Registered: 03/13/01
Posts: 4
Loc: snohomish wa. snohomish co.
|
I fish with those two poles , the GL3 is my drift rod and the certified pro is my second pole mainly used for bobber fishing.The GL is better but if I had a choice between two specilty rods from lamiglas or one GL for everything I would pick the lamiglas.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50240 - 03/17/01 03:03 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Egg
Registered: 02/12/01
Posts: 3
Loc: Vancouver BC Canada
|
You guys have it all wrong, best drift rods on the market...second to NONE...is TALON rods. Blow Gl3 and Sage away....please you guys should know better since they are built in WA state...we've been using them in Canada for real salmon (not those guppies you guys have) and the rods have been unreal. I have used all types of rods and have never owned a more stronger responsive rod.
period.
Talon.
And I do not work for them.
[This message has been edited by Bongo from BC (edited 03-17-2001).]
_________________________
The Sensitive Fisherman
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50241 - 04/04/01 07:16 PM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Spawner
Registered: 01/03/01
Posts: 797
Loc: Post Falls, ID
|
I have a GL2 Loomis for my drift rod but for bobber fishing, I really like my Lamiglass cert pro. Not sure of the exact number, but it's the Dave Vedder signiture rod.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50243 - 04/23/01 12:08 PM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 12/06/99
Posts: 419
Loc: Seattle
|
Well, at least dcrzfitter was HALF right.
_________________________
Teach your kids, Ever wonder why Noah didn`t just slap them 2 mosquitos????
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50244 - 04/30/01 05:14 PM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Spawner
Registered: 12/26/99
Posts: 745
|
I love my GL2. Sensitive, and lots of backbone. GL3's are even better but they are pricey. Yeah, i'd go with Loomis and Chevy. lol
save a trout, bonk a bass
_________________________
"I have a fair idea of what to expect from the river, and usually, because I fish it that way, the river gives me approximately what I expect of it. But sooner or later something always comes up to change the set of my ways..." - Roderick Haig-Brown
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#50245 - 05/02/01 12:48 AM
Re: Lamiglass vs. G. Loomis
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
i think g loomis are good rods but now that shimano baught them i feel they are doing a inferior job they are usiny ****ty components. so i think lamiglas has the upper hand now i think g loomis mave have lost it once they sold out...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
669
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73018 Topics
826028 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|