#536180 - 09/10/09 02:15 AM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: carpdiem]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 03/06/01
Posts: 1200
Loc: Gig Harbor, WA
|
I'd rather not think about that,
fb
_________________________
"Laugh if you want to, it really is kinda funny, cuz the world is a car and you're the crash test dummy" All Hail, The Devil Makes Three
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536181 - 09/10/09 02:20 AM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: carpdiem]
|
Spawner
Registered: 11/07/03
Posts: 601
|
What about egg weights used to fish eggs under a float. Are they illegal? Just keep the weights 12 or more inches above the eggs, and you will be legal
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536260 - 09/10/09 01:10 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: cheapskate]
|
Dick Nipples
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 27840
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
|
I think the only change from the previous anti-snagging rule is that a shorebound angler using a floating lure can now use more than one single point hook...the rest, as confusing as it is, hasn't changed.
My take is that you can use a leadhead under a float, like a jig...but a Dedfish weight would not be legal, unless it was at least 12 inches from the bait, which would kind of make it a pretty ineffective technique.
The rule hasn't changed for the boaties, just for the shore guys...mainly allows for tossing plugs from the bank, can have two hooks now, instead of just the one that was required before.
I think.
Fish on...
Todd
_________________________
 Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536273 - 09/10/09 02:03 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Dan S.]
|
Repeat Spawner
Registered: 07/06/04
Posts: 1069
Loc: Everett
|
I still have donkeys tell me I shouldn't be using a spinner in rivers with the 'Non-buoyant lure restriction' in place. I'm sure they'll understand this new rule, though.
I've got that a few times. Fishing a jig on the Snohomish and a boat full of redneck dumbasses threaten to turn me in for using a lure that sinks. I asked WTF they were talking about and got the "its a NBL restricted area,you can only use lures that float".
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536274 - 09/10/09 02:06 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: SundayMoney]
|
The Tide changed
Registered: 08/31/00
Posts: 7083
Loc: Everett
|
I cannot beleive we can't use a bait weight now, that's totally ridiculous and very shortsighted by the WDFW. What about the Dead Fish Bait Weight company? This puts him out of business I suppose.
Fishing a glob of eggs with a small split shot or colored bullet weight is one of my most effective techniques. and it REALLY SUCKS that it's now deemed illegal. I think the WDFW should re-write the rule to allow bait weights, and re-issue a clarified statement depicting exactly what is and is not illegal under the revised rules.
_________________________
You know something bad is going to happen when you hear..."Hey, hold my beer and watch this"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536276 - 09/10/09 02:13 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
Dick Nipples
Registered: 03/08/99
Posts: 27840
Loc: Seattle, Washington USA
|
Remember, this only applies in waters that fall under the "Anti-Snagging Rule", which aren't all that many, and only at specific times in those waters.
Fish on...
Todd
_________________________
 Team Flying Super Ditch Pickle
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536279 - 09/10/09 02:17 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Castingpearls]
|
The Tide changed
Registered: 08/31/00
Posts: 7083
Loc: Everett
|
Good point Todd, but it still steps on my toes a bit.
That is Correct Castingpearls. However, if I am banking it, fishing for Coho, up to Nov. 30th on the river I like to fish a lot, you cannot use a bait weight.
_________________________
You know something bad is going to happen when you hear..."Hey, hold my beer and watch this"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536281 - 09/10/09 02:21 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Sky-Guy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 02/14/06
Posts: 2533
Loc: Elma
|
You know, at my job I write technical papers/reports/etc. Sometimes I want to make several points in one paragraph, and 7 times out of 10 that paragraph is very hard to read. Why can't WDFW ever just use a bullet list? Just once, organize a paragraph, use some freakin' white space, and give us all a chance to understand it.
So far I understand I am supposed to attach trebble hooks to my bobber, a single hook on my plug, a corkie pegged 12" from my spinner, and anything that I get from the gill plate forward must be retained.
_________________________
WDFW - Turning outdoorsmen into golfers since 1994.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536285 - 09/10/09 02:37 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Rocket Red]
|
The Chosen One
Registered: 02/09/00
Posts: 13951
Loc: Mitulaville
|
and anything that I get from the gill plate forward must be retained. Yup. That's why there are a lot of folks out there snagging humpies in the ass or belly - so they don't have to keep them if they were hooked in mouth. 
_________________________
T.K. Paker
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536296 - 09/10/09 03:33 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Todd]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 09/22/05
Posts: 249
Loc: Seattle
|
I think the only change from the previous anti-snagging rule is that a shorebound angler using a floating lure can now use more than one single point hook...the rest, as confusing as it is, hasn't changed.
My take is that you can use a leadhead under a float, like a jig...but a Dedfish weight would not be legal, unless it was at least 12 inches from the bait, which would kind of make it a pretty ineffective technique.
The rule hasn't changed for the boaties, just for the shore guys...mainly allows for tossing plugs from the bank, can have two hooks now, instead of just the one that was required before.
I think.
Fish on...
Todd That may have been their intent, but that's not what I read in the release...no longer any mention of the two hook restriction for trolling.
Edited by salty (09/11/09 11:40 AM)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536384 - 09/10/09 07:14 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Satan]
|
Ornamental Rice Bowl
Registered: 11/24/03
Posts: 12620
|
Why does this have to be difficult. Make the leader length 4 ' maximum with single barbless hooks.
I got one better... All rods should be equipped to deliver a hi-voltage shock each and every time the operator jerks before the rod is fully loaded. Done.... But that would be too easy.... Not to mention damned fun to watch at the local snaggery.
_________________________
"Let every angler who loves to fish think what it would mean to him to find the fish were gone." (Zane Grey) "If you don't kill them, they will spawn." (Carcassman) The Keen Eye MDLong Live the Kings!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536581 - 09/11/09 11:04 AM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: Todd]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 10/26/07
Posts: 253
Loc: Everett, WA
|
Wow, I thought I understood it until I read this. Thanks
_________________________
FISHING: It's not life or death. It is much more important then that!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#536720 - 09/11/09 03:43 PM
Re: Anti-Snagging Rule Modified
[Re: fire escape]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 01/17/04
Posts: 3758
Loc: Sheltona Beach
|
Wow, I thought I understood it until I read this. Thanks Since a bait weight is used below a float, well isn't it a floating lure?
_________________________
When we are forgotten, we cease to exist . Share your outdoor skills.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
574
Guests and
2
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73006 Topics
825904 Posts
Max Online: 3937 @ 07/19/24 03:28 AM
|
|
|