#657457 - 01/25/11 05:33 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Larry B]
|
GOOD LUCK
Registered: 08/09/00
Posts: 11969
Loc: Hobart,Wa U.S.A
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#657460 - 01/25/11 05:46 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Larry B]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 04/25/00
Posts: 5048
Loc: East of Aberdeen, West of Mont...
|
INunyet - There has been a lot of discussion about who will fund removal of nets and pots in the future. Please recall that nets still do not have to be identified as to owner nor do they have to be reported if lost. But that is another story. Seems to me, if it was moved closer to the "front burner", in Olympia, then those that are causing the problem, would have to be responsible for their actions.....why should the resource suffer "in walls of death", because someone is protecting the asses of the commercial fleet?????????
_________________________
"Worse day sport fishing, still better than the best day working"
"I thought growing older, would take longer"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#657498 - 01/25/11 09:54 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Moravec]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 05/22/03
Posts: 145
|
Moravec, Here are a few snippets I put together for the folks on the forum that actually admit to killing fish once in a while: "Most license fees go into the wildlife account. (Bushbear can correct me, but I think saltwater, shellfish and clam licenses go into general fund). You can find out quite a bit about the budget here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/budget/I thought these 2 were particularly helpful: http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01145/wdfw_01145.pdfhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/about/legislative/fact_sheets/2010_facing_future.pdfI checked a spreadsheet I have from the department. For license year 2009 (April 09 - Mar 10?), it shows total fishing license revenue of $20.7M, total big game of $10.2M, total small game of $3.0M, and grand total license revenue of $34.9M. From the links I posted previously, total WDFW budget for the 2009-11 biennium was $327M, or about $164M per year. So the difference there ($164M minus $35M = $129M) is about what comes from federal taxes on fishing and hunting gear, contracts with PUD's, feds, etc., and general fund." Bottom line, less than 25% of the agencies operating costs are covered by recreational license revenue. Hope that helps.
_________________________
yelloweye
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#657514 - 01/25/11 10:36 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: yelloweye]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 01/05/07
Posts: 1551
Loc: Bremerton, Wa.
|
You have left out some important items like what outdoor recreation is worth to the state and all the jobs created by sporties, I believe there is a state study that speaks to this......license fees are only a small part of it and ours dwarf that paid by the commercials.
_________________________
A little common sense is good, more is better. Kitsap Chapter CCA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#657561 - 01/26/11 12:52 AM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: N W Panhandler]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 4681
Loc: Sequim
|
Most license fees go into the wildlife account. (Bushbear can correct me, but I think saltwater, shellfish and clam licenses go into general fund).
Correct. Looks like that will change though. Commercial fees and ex-vessel taxes will probably still go to the GF
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#657566 - 01/26/11 01:04 AM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: bushbear]
|
Juvenile at Sea
Registered: 05/22/03
Posts: 145
|
NWP,
I thought the question he asked was what was the license contribution towards the total budget. I tried to answer that and nothing else; and hopefully I did. Please feel free to elaborate on all other aspects that are worth discussing.
Cheers.
_________________________
yelloweye
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658629 - 01/29/11 06:54 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: boater]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 04/25/00
Posts: 5048
Loc: East of Aberdeen, West of Mont...
|
i`m going to wait until i hear the outcome of NOF before i buy mine, if they screw things up to bad i wont buy one. Sure you'll buy one.........you can only post so much. Just like my tag line says, "worse day sport fishing, still better than the best day working".
Edited by DrifterWA (01/29/11 06:54 PM)
_________________________
"Worse day sport fishing, still better than the best day working"
"I thought growing older, would take longer"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658770 - 01/30/11 01:59 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Hair]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 10/22/09
Posts: 3045
Loc: University Place and Whidbey I...
|
Director Anderson obliquely addressed Hair's concern at the last Commission meeting when he alluded to the Department having some projections of license fee increases (adversely) affecting license sales. None of the Commissioners questioned him on that nor did he elaborate further. This may come up at the Senate hearing on the WDFW budget.
Survey results from 2010 revealed that a large percentage of folks having purchased a P.S. crab endorsement (at $3.00) did not participate. Will those same folks pitch in $7.50 in 2011 "just in case" they have a chance to crab? My guess is there will be some price resistance although the new P.S. crab management policy with its expanded seasons might counter the price increase.
The good thing about adjusting multiple variables at the same time is it creates a lot of opportunity after the fact for finger pointing (oops, I meant polite discussions).
Never ending drama.
Edited by Larry B (01/30/11 03:04 PM)
_________________________
Remember to immediately record your catch or you may become the catch!
It's the person who has done nothing who is sure nothing can be done. (Ewing)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658774 - 01/30/11 02:10 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Larry B]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 03/03/09
Posts: 4719
Loc: Somewhere on the planet,I hope
|
Well one might find out the full break down in the fishing license thing. If it applies to lake fishing they will loose a bunch of sales and this portion is a huge part of the puzzle. They are just folks taking the kids fishing and at a point the value is not there.
_________________________
Dazed and confused.............the fog is closing in
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658776 - 01/30/11 02:21 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: Rivrguy]
|
River Nutrients
Registered: 11/21/07
Posts: 7957
Loc: Olema,California,Planet Earth
|
This will be a pink year. A couple million in the Green and Puyallup will draw hordes of license buyers. Probably take up the slack for the non-buyers, this year.
Trouble will be the non-pink year, after hatchery cuts put less trout in lakes.
The invrease in fees will keep weeding out the casual angler, family, etc. WDFW seems to recognize, but doesn't addres, the aging of the hunting and fishing crowd. I have heard that Opening Day used to be a family event; now it is mostly adults from what I have heard.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658778 - 01/30/11 02:24 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: DrifterWA]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 07/01/09
Posts: 1597
Loc: common sense ave.
|
Sure you'll buy one.........
maybe, but i do look at what kind of opportunity`s we get to fish around here, if after they are done i feel that they are good i will buy a license, if not i wont and will go up north.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658824 - 01/30/11 08:13 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: yelloweye]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 05/31/08
Posts: 257
|
Moravec, Here are a few snippets I put together for the folks on the forum that actually admit to killing fish once in a while: "Most license fees go into the wildlife account. (Bushbear can correct me, but I think saltwater, shellfish and clam licenses go into general fund). You can find out quite a bit about the budget here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/budget/I thought these 2 were particularly helpful: http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01145/wdfw_01145.pdfhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/about/legislative/fact_sheets/2010_facing_future.pdfI checked a spreadsheet I have from the department. For license year 2009 (April 09 - Mar 10?), it shows total fishing license revenue of $20.7M, total big game of $10.2M, total small game of $3.0M, and grand total license revenue of $34.9M. From the links I posted previously, total WDFW budget for the 2009-11 biennium was $327M, or about $164M per year. So the difference there ($164M minus $35M = $129M) is about what comes from federal taxes on fishing and hunting gear, contracts with PUD's, feds, etc., and general fund." Bottom line, less than 25% of the agencies operating costs are covered by recreational license revenue. Hope that helps. GREAT POST!! Very informative. The 1st link ( http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01145/wdfw_01145.pdf) lists all of the activities WDFW does, and then breaks down their cost and # of FTE's. Except at the end of page 3 it has a caveat that says: Funding also supports: Commercial and recreational licensing; asset management; regional operations; information technology; fiscal and budget management, public information, human resources, safety, revolving accounts; Fish and Wildlife Commission activities; policy and executive management. Or what you could call ADMINISTRATION, and it doesn't seem to break this component of the Agency down. The second link you post ( http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/legislative/fact_sheets/2010_facing_future.pdf) has the 2009-2011 biennuim budget listed as $327.1 million dollars and 1,386 FTE's. So if you take the infomation from your 1st link and calculate: The TOTAL you only get 1,206.6 FTEs for $252.7 million dollars of funding which averages out to around $209,431 spent per FTE (Full time equivalent employee for those of you that don't know). Where's the rest? Well if you take $327.1 minus the $252.7 you get $74.4 million left over for what I assume is the FUNDING ALSO SUPPORTS little caveat portion (23% of the TOTAL BUDGET!!!). Doing the same mah for FTEs (1,386 minus 1,206) you get 179.4 FTEs which calculates out to over $400,000 per FTE for F*#$ing ADMINISTRATIVE costs for WDFW. You've got to be kidding me!!!!!! I've seen JohnQ on other posts complain about the # of IT folks they had, but not until I reviewed the actual #'s the AGENCY ITSELF PUT OUT THERE can I say. . . that is one HELL of a BUREACRACY! Hell of a good reason to raise my licencse fee right?! Goes back to the classic 2 old government rules: 1) Bureacracies must grow or die; 2) Bureacracies never die.
Edited by rojoband (01/30/11 08:28 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#658974 - 01/31/11 02:02 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: rojoband]
|
Spawner
Registered: 09/21/08
Posts: 843
Loc: COF in the Upper Left Hand Cor...
|
Moravec, Here are a few snippets I put together for the folks on the forum that actually admit to killing fish once in a while: "Most license fees go into the wildlife account. (Bushbear can correct me, but I think saltwater, shellfish and clam licenses go into general fund). You can find out quite a bit about the budget here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/budget/I thought these 2 were particularly helpful: http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01145/wdfw_01145.pdfhttp://wdfw.wa.gov/about/legislative/fact_sheets/2010_facing_future.pdfI checked a spreadsheet I have from the department. For license year 2009 (April 09 - Mar 10?), it shows total fishing license revenue of $20.7M, total big game of $10.2M, total small game of $3.0M, and grand total license revenue of $34.9M. From the links I posted previously, total WDFW budget for the 2009-11 biennium was $327M, or about $164M per year. So the difference there ($164M minus $35M = $129M) is about what comes from federal taxes on fishing and hunting gear, contracts with PUD's, feds, etc., and general fund." Bottom line, less than 25% of the agencies operating costs are covered by recreational license revenue. Hope that helps. GREAT POST!! Very informative. The 1st link ( http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01145/wdfw_01145.pdf) lists all of the activities WDFW does, and then breaks down their cost and # of FTE's. Except at the end of page 3 it has a caveat that says: Funding also supports: Commercial and recreational licensing; asset management; regional operations; information technology; fiscal and budget management, public information, human resources, safety, revolving accounts; Fish and Wildlife Commission activities; policy and executive management. Or what you could call ADMINISTRATION, and it doesn't seem to break this component of the Agency down. The second link you post ( http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/legislative/fact_sheets/2010_facing_future.pdf) has the 2009-2011 biennuim budget listed as $327.1 million dollars and 1,386 FTE's. So if you take the infomation from your 1st link and calculate: The TOTAL you only get 1,206.6 FTEs for $252.7 million dollars of funding which averages out to around $209,431 spent per FTE (Full time equivalent employee for those of you that don't know). Where's the rest? Well if you take $327.1 minus the $252.7 you get $74.4 million left over for what I assume is the FUNDING ALSO SUPPORTS little caveat portion (23% of the TOTAL BUDGET!!!). Doing the same mah for FTEs (1,386 minus 1,206) you get 179.4 FTEs which calculates out to over $400,000 per FTE for F*#$ing ADMINISTRATIVE costs for WDFW. You've got to be kidding me!!!!!! I've seen JohnQ on other posts complain about the # of IT folks they had, but not until I reviewed the actual #'s the AGENCY ITSELF PUT OUT THERE can I say. . . that is one HELL of a BUREACRACY! Hell of a good reason to raise my licencse fee right?! Goes back to the classic 2 old government rules: 1) Bureacracies must grow or die; 2) Bureacracies never die.  Well, I'll Be D*mned, somebody else doing the 3rd grade math  Careful Rojo, some Maiden "Aunt" will be along shortly and chew your azz  I kinda think you are a Tad Low on the estimated number of ADMIN FTE, I believe it is between 55% - 60% from what I have downloaded from IBloom.net Sure wish IBloom would update the numbers to include 2010 FTE, that would be an eye opener. Then again, if I were you, I would be very skeptical regarding anything put out by WDFW requiring more than 3rd grade math skills. I have a "Crab Scofflaw Violation Spreadsheet Presentation" put out by a certain unnamed shellfish manager that can't add with any accurracy beyond 2 decimal positions (sure wish I could figure out how to display that here!!!). 
_________________________
Upstanding Member of the Porcupine Social Club, ergo, the Old Prick in the Upper Left Hand Corner.
AuntyM -- What Crab Audit???? Not That POS Senior AssHat Published!!!!
Hey Mr Childers, have you corrected that Scofflaw Spreadsheet Yet?????
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#659026 - 01/31/11 04:40 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: ]
|
Returning Adult
Registered: 05/30/08
Posts: 273
Loc: Seattle
|
I think (opinion alert) every sportie would be willing to pay more than they did last year (as a direct user fee) if they knew that the money was going to fund what they were paying to use and those doing the paying out were doing it as efficiently as possible (enter Brian Sonntag). It seems simple; show without treasurer loop holes (such as the treasurer reserves the right to transfer these funds to the general fund etc) that the money is going to support and improve the fisheries we use and the people who use it will pay more to improve it with future generation in mind. It has been shown to be complicated currently, but if the state can't show reasonably (yes, maybe in 3rd grade math so we can all get it) exactly how and where the money is being used, then do you suppose everyone involved with the legislation (picture patty murray here) actually understands the cash flow?
The best charities go to great lengths to show that as high a percentage as possible of the donation will make it to those they claim to be helping as efficiently as possible. if the state can't do that, shouldn't we be readily donating to other private organizations and not the state in the form of user fees?
I guess we could do both while picturing our kids taking grip and grins 30 years from now....
2 cents..
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#659119 - 01/31/11 11:13 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: ]
|
Spawner
Registered: 09/21/08
Posts: 843
Loc: COF in the Upper Left Hand Cor...
|
John, I only get pissed off at jackasses that attack WDFW individuals by name, when SOME of us have to work with those people. You are clueless when it comes to working with others trying to accomplish a goal. Well M, it is Your Choice to work with incompetent idiots at WDFW that cannot do simple 3rd grade math that is presented at the State PSA Board meeting (if you want, I can email you and anyone else for that matter, a copy of Childers/Cenci's Crab Violation Spreadsheet -- just PM me). My "Clueness" unlike yours, does NOT tolerate nor accept basic incompetence at that level of my Tax & Fee Monies. You see, it is quite simple, my standards are very high, hence the level of my "Clueness." Or better yet, does anybody here at PP have any ideas on how to display quite a wide spreadsheet of Sport Crabbing Violations (The Scofflaw Report). And M, Cenci is not a happy camper with Childers and company mixing their "Micrometer" Violations with his crews Plastic everyday measurer. Here's a preparatory measuring (kinda like the "H" type) question for the PP folks, "what is the decimal fractional equivalent to 3 MM's?"  PS added on edit -- M you have mail.
Edited by JohnQ (01/31/11 11:28 PM)
_________________________
Upstanding Member of the Porcupine Social Club, ergo, the Old Prick in the Upper Left Hand Corner.
AuntyM -- What Crab Audit???? Not That POS Senior AssHat Published!!!!
Hey Mr Childers, have you corrected that Scofflaw Spreadsheet Yet?????
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#659201 - 02/01/11 10:38 AM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: ]
|
Spawner
Registered: 09/21/08
Posts: 843
Loc: COF in the Upper Left Hand Cor...
|
It's my "choice"??? What the hell are you smoking? Should all the advisors quit to make you happy? We don't hire or promote managers. We work with who is chosen for the job.
Should recreational crabbers NOT be represented on an advisory committee or do you think only people hand picked by you should serve?
Like I said. You're a jackass. Take a couple of deep breaths M, I expect the "Citizens" on the various committees to represent "Citizens" not shill for incompetent WDFW Managers, real simple. I agree, committee members do not hire or fire managers, but when a manager is caught lying to the F&W Commissioners, I would expect that committee to collectively raise some hell about it to those commissioners (like YOU & other members except 2, did), and should've raised the same hell with the Director which was NOT done. You have made this Manager's Blunders an issue between you & I. Do you believe it has done the Program any good shielding that level of incompetence? Should I post for all to see that presentation to the State PSA Board (the files I emailed to you last night)? Please stick information content that is good for the shellfish (Crab) program.
_________________________
Upstanding Member of the Porcupine Social Club, ergo, the Old Prick in the Upper Left Hand Corner.
AuntyM -- What Crab Audit???? Not That POS Senior AssHat Published!!!!
Hey Mr Childers, have you corrected that Scofflaw Spreadsheet Yet?????
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#659232 - 02/01/11 12:12 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: JohnQ]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 07/01/09
Posts: 1597
Loc: common sense ave.
|
Do you believe it has done the Program any good shielding that level of incompetence?
i dont, i`d call them on it in a minute.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#659281 - 02/01/11 02:54 PM
Re: Hunting, fishing license fee increase legislation
[Re: ]
|
Three Time Spawner
Registered: 07/01/09
Posts: 1597
Loc: common sense ave.
|
Do you believe it has done the Program any good shielding that level of incompetence?
i dont, i`d call them on it in a minute. Then get yourself to a commission meeting and do it yourself. Oh wait... you just spout off on the internet. other people do have opinions on fisherys matters, you should try to control yourself and not automatically go into your attack mode.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (Carcassman),
792
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
11505 Members
17 Forums
73112 Topics
827563 Posts
Max Online: 6695 @ 03/13/26 11:11 AM
|
|
|