(CNN) -- George Zimmerman "didn't do anything unlawful" and was "justified" in shooting 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, according to one of the jurors who acquitted Zimmerman.

What is important is the American legal tradition which holds that all are innocent until proven guilty. Then journalists, liberals, along with the so-called civil rights leaders try to whip up a lynch mob and/or kangaroo court trial. Make no mistake, since I'm not racist, if the actual evidence and forensics shows that a racist Zimmerman really did instigate the fight and gun down an innocent kid, I don't ever want to see that man spend one more day of his life outside of a jail cell. If, however, the evidence does not show him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, he must go free with no further repercussions. Anything else would be an injustice.

What I don't like is that this was a political trial, not a trial based on law and justice. You should only be brought to trial, if there is enough evidence that you broke the law. Bill Lee, the SPD chief who stepped down during this said there was "pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice." Why the black community, the media and white liberals think it's OK to try and pervert justice with this lynch mob mentality is beyond me. Man is not a sacrificial animal to be used to placate the public. Regardless of your beliefs about Zimmerman's racism or your opinions on him, we should only use provable evidence in a court of law and not use the media to try him in the court of public opinion.

Based on the same evidence, in that scenario I would say that he was railroaded. If you recall, before the verdict was announced, I predicted acquittal based on the evidence presented at the trial and my watching of the trial. If the evidence was different, my opinion would of course be different. If the evidence proved what the media alleged, I'd like to see him in jail, the problem is, it didn't.

todd would run laps on you in a court of law. but you watched a few court episodes and googled a bit.






You are categorically wrong; the law and consequently the jury agreed with FP because evidnce and FACTS always trump emotion.


Ten posts and somehow you are entitled?



Show the fellas some respect friend.

Like a moth to the flame..................

fixed.

yo BO, who are you?

FP, when Zimmerman assumed that Martin was a "punk", "asshole", and was "going to get away with it", that's exactly what he did...denied Martin his humanity, and instead assumed he was a thief and a trespasser, and his shitferbrains reaction to his shitferbrains assumptions directly lead to the death of a kid.

Fish on...

Todd