Benghazi!

Fish on...

Todd

From your history, it is doubtful that you even read past the headline. Since you're obviously the guy with the facts around here, Hank, why don't you lay out the story?

Are you calling the soldiers liars? Why do you hate America?

You are delusional and proved my point that you actually didn't read the article.

You are the classic know-it-all that knows nothing. You are like RedHook in that you don't seem able to STFU even when it would be in your best interest.

If you weren't such a blowhard, I'd feel really bad for you.

You seem to really be obsessed with ball washing?

You should nail that point down with some quotes from me. I've got over 4000 posts from you to choose from and you seem to have nothing else in your life to do anyway.

"It (Iraq) possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons."
George W Bush, October 2002 in Cincinnati.

I can't keep conversing with liars that hate U.S. soldiers, Hank.

how can you say that Iraq and Saddam didnt have chemical weapons?

the guy USED them...

plus after the first Gulf War, they found and destroyed stockpiles of them.... that was in the early 90s if you dont remember..

put it this way, if Iraq didnt have chemical weapons, then Iran isnt building or trying to build a nuke, and North Korea are just trying to get into the UN so that they can love everyone and help every country that is ever attacked...

bullsh!t...

Apparently you guys are using Google selectively...a quick search came up with these true and accurate quotes:

"The US must invade Iraq in order to prevent an attack in Benghazi in 2013." - Colin Powell to the U.N.

"We must contain the growing threat in Iraq, the thread that the IRS will target conservative patriot groups." - Dick Cheney during lunch break while quail hunting.

"If we fail in Iraq then Ebola will visit our shores." - Condy Rice's 2002 Commencement Speech at Oral Roberts University.

"The threat of seeing Russia from my porch must be contained!" - Sarah Palin talking to her Raggedy Ann doll.

Unfortunately, as we all know, Obama cut and run from Iraq and that is what ultimately caused all these right wing apoplectic fits.

Hank, if you believe that we weren't sold a bill of goods to invade Iraq nominally to prevent them from using WMDs on us then you are even dumber than you pretend to be most the time on here.

Fish on...

Todd

was that before or after you quit working?

Neither.


He would have to start working in order to quit working.

Don't forget the actual non-satirical fact that 67% of Fox News viewers think that the USA had clear and compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the attacks on 9/11 and that we were invading Iraq because of that.

I wish that were a joke...but it's not.

For that poll, and others that show the idiocy of dimwits like Hank and the rest of the right wing fearniks, birthers, conspiracy theorists, racists, bigots, fools, and jackwagons...go here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies

Fish on...

Todd

Just in case you were still shoving your head ten feet up your ass...

*****************
http://www.realnews247.com/wmd_quote_before_after_the_invasion.htm

WMD Quotes Before & After The Invasion

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
Dick Cheney
August 26, 2002

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.
George W. Bush
September 12, 2002

If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.
Ari Fleischer
December 2, 2002

The president of the United States and the secretary of defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it.
Ari Fleischer December 6, 2002

We know for a fact that there are weapons there.
Ari Fleischer January 9, 2003

Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.
George W. Bush
January 28, 2003

We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.
Colin Powell
February 5, 2003

We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.
George W. Bush
February 8, 2003

So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? . . . I think our judgment has to be clearly not.
Colin Powell
March 7, 2003

We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons.
Vice President Dick Chaney
March 16, 2003

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.
George W. Bush
March 17, 2003

Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes.
Ari Fleisher
March 21, 2003

There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. And . . . as this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them.
Gen. Tommy Franks
March 22, 2003

I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.
Defense Policy Board member Kenneth Adelman
March 23, 2003

One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites.
Pentagon Spokeswoman Victoria Clark
March 22, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
Donald Rumsfeld
March 30, 2003

Obviously the administration intends to publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find -- and there will be plenty.
Neocon scholar Robert Kagan
April 9, 2003

I think you have always heard, and you continue to hear from officials, a measure of high confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass destruction will be found.
Ari Fleischer
April 10, 2003

We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them.
George W. Bush
April 24, 2003

There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
April 25, 2003

We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so.
George W. Bush
May 3, 2003

I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.
Colin Powell
May 4, 2003

We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
May 4, 2003

I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program.
George W. Bush
May 6, 2003

U.S. officials never expected that "we were going to open garages and find" weapons of mass destruction.
Condoleeza Rice
May 12, 2003

I just don't know whether it was all destroyed years ago -- I mean, there's no question that there were chemical weapons years ago -- whether they were destroyed right before the war, (or) whether they're still hidden.
Maj. Gen. David Petraeus, Commander 101st Airborne
May 13, 2003

I don't believe anyone that I know in the administration ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons.
Donald Rumsfeld,
May 14, 2003


Before the war, there's no doubt in my mind that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical. I expected them to be found. I still expect them to be found.
Gen. Michael Hagee, Commandant of the Marine Corps
May 21, 2003

Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.
Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff
May 26, 2003

They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer.
Donald Rumsfeld
May 27, 2003

For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.
Paul Wolfowitz
May 28, 2003

It was a surprise to me then — it remains a surprise to me now — that we have not uncovered weapons, as you say, in some of the forward dispersal sites. Believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there.
Lt. Gen. James Conway, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force
May 30, 2003

**************

Fish on...

Todd

In typical "My name is Hank and I am fullofshit" posting style he posts up a whole bunch of irrelevant crap.

What does any of that have to do with your blatantly incorrect revisionist history about what the Bush Administration said about why we went to war?

You said they didn't say it was about WMDs, yet there they are saying it over and over and over again...were you the only one not paying attention all that time?

Fish on...

Todd

Typical...fuckk the facts, I found a right wing blog that told me all I need to know.

Did you really need to look that up? Were you in a fuckin coma from 2001 until the present?

Fish on...

Todd

Typical...but good effort.

What TeaBagger blog did you get your "facts" from this time?

If you didn't think the Bush Administration said they were there to get the WMDs...which frankly is almost impossible to believe, since they said it nearly every day for four fuckin years..what did you think they were using as their excuse to go to war?

9/11, like 2/3 of the Fox News viewers?

Ebola?

Fish on...

Todd

Still wondering about what you thought they were talking about for all those years when they were yelling "WMDs!" all day, every day, for years.

Were you busy researching about that whole "Vote GOP for the economy!" thing?

Fish on...

Todd

I know, he is like an old version of RedHook. Normally, that wouldn't be a big deal but the problem is that he has more posts than anyone else on this whole site... EVER. When you add those together, you get site erosion where people first stop posting and eventually stop looking entirely. Why post or even read when the town blowhard is just going to spray rhea on everything in short order?

The craziest part is that RedHank clearly thinks of himself as the "winner", whatever that means.

If spend half as much time as RedHank on the Internet when I retire, someone cast a 16/0 into my skull and snag me out of my misery.

So...the fact that they did it for several years nonstop, and everyone in the world...literally...heard them say it daily...literally...for years...literally...

...you read something on The Blaze yesterday that said otherwise, and so you ignored the many years of reality, accepted that as your new truth, and then just forged ahead?

This is why the GOP is full of fuckin clowns...this is how their supporters act, and it's how they expect their GOP reps to act. Facts are superflous...horseshit blogs are key.

Economy? Who cares about facts. The GOP is better, Sean Hannity said so. Nevermind that every single study and statistic on the issue shows exactly the opposite.

Reagan ruined the economy, ruined the middle class, and we paid far higher taxes under Reagan than we do now?

Fuckthatshit. Reagan was the man, and I ain't gonna let no stupid facts or reality tell me otherwise. I heard Mitt Romney say it during a debate once, so it's true.

Global Climate Change? 99.9% of actual scientists say we are causing it to be much worse? Fuckthatshit, too. Charles Krauthammer said it was a hoax, and so did one Climatologist who got his degree at Oral Roberts University.

Not only does that sound like a full blown controversial debate, I think it's a conspiratorial hoax expounded by Obama, who, incidentally was born in Nigeria, or Kenya, and is a Marxist, or Socialist, or maybe a Fascist...fuckit, I don't even know where those countries are (are they even countries?), and I clearly have no idea what a Marxist, Socialist, or a Fascist is, anyway.

Aren't they just all the same? I mean, the Nazis were fascists, and it says "socialist" right in their name, right?

Whogivesashit? I read it on The Blaze, and if a patriot like Glenn Beck believes it then who am I to question it?

How can you go on by denying reality on a daily basis?

How can people like you continue to vote for people and policies that go directly against everything that you claim to support and want?

How can you be so fuckin stupid?

In the long run, that's what it comes down to.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Hank does stupid.

Fish on...

Todd

Hank, I used to think you were just poking fun and acting stupid, like trying to be a satire of Sol Dunce, or Slappy...but it's clear one of two things has happened...

1. You really were that stupid all along, or
2. You got Stockholm Syndrome from reading so much horseshit right wing drivel while researching how to be a satirical dumbass that you became an actual dumbass.

In the long run it doesn't really matter...you are clearly as stupid as they come now.

I'm surprised the GOP doesn't send you on tour with Joe the Plumber to rile up the masses of stupidity to more stupid heights.

Fish on...

Todd

Which "news" source told you that Bushcorp never said they were going into Iraq to get those pesky WMDs that they were just about to use on us?

Neveminding the fact that even you should have immediately dismissed that as complete and utter horseshit, I'm not all that surprised that you ditched reality and reason to believe it...but I'm curious as to who told you that in such compellng terms that you plumb forgot about the last 15 years?

Was it The Blaze?

TeaParty.org?

TeaPartyPatriots.org?

TeaPartyExpress.org?

Those four are right up your alley...utterly in denial of reality and facts, but full of certainty and stupidity.

Something a bit more subtle like cpac.org? Just kidding...they're as stupid as the TeaBaggers.

How about redstate.com? Focus on the Family? Cato?

Ted Nugent?

Rudy Giuliani?

How about that stalwart of reality, Donald Trump?

Let me guess...you got an anonymous right wing email from one of your many anonymous right wing email chains, and in good right wing soldier style you didn't even bother to compare it to the facts you know in your own pudding head, much less reality, and just accepted it as gospel since it said something you prefer to reality?

Or...the good ol' way for right wing douchebags to get their "news"...you watched Fox?

Which one was it?

Fish on...

Todd