So the BIA is not a fisheries-oriented agency, but they solicit for the tribes to net on endangered fish runs. The BIA says there are enough fish, so:

Who is counting the harvestable fish numbers vs the endangered ESA killed?

And, if our share is 50/50, shouldn't sport fisherman get a non-tribal fishing time to compemsate the catch ratio? To mame it 50/50 like the Decision says, sport fishers need time to catch up, and also to improve the economy.
(Yes, I know this is rediculous...but I still ask: Who's counting, either to make the BIA and NOAA eat crow, or to open a counterbalancing fishery?)


Edited by ned (05/06/16 04:36 PM)