It is pretty clear that the State, under Boldt, has to ensure that the Tribe's have dead fish in the boat. Boldt II, the habitat aspect (and it spawned the culvert case) has the State scared spitless because they have to ensure fish to catch.

So, yes, the State needs to operate hatcheries to meet Tribal needs. But, the cost of those hatcheries is a State responsibility and not the responsibility of the recreational angler, or even the commercial netter. It is the State's responsibility because the State chose development over habitat protection.