Those of you who are high fiving the legislature for sticking it to WDFW, be careful what you wish for. You don't want the legislature becoming more involved in fish and wildlife management in the state. I suspect that many (most?) of the legislative districts have a majority of people who don't hunt or fish and the importance and perspective of these people on fish and wildlife will differ from those that do. In another forum or issue of interest, the outcome for hunters and fishers may not be so favorable after the legislature has their hands on it.