Just looked up and read Rafeedie, I am not a lawyer, but it looks to be fairly understandable to me. This is what I get out of it.

Much like Boldt set up provisions for a Fishery Advisory Board, Rafeedie set up provisions for a "special master" to hear and decide disputes. I am sure the state will claim there is nothing they can do when a tribe harvests without an agreement, but this simply is not true. There are clear guidelines about how to object and, in particular, an order to set up "Special Masters". I am not an attorney, but the lack of these "Special Masters" to hear disputes would appear to put the parties out of compliance with Rafeedie. I need to show up for one of the meetings with a copy of the court order in my hand, so when they claim there is nothing they can do I can read it aloud, then ask if they are idiots or just liars, because one of the two must be true.