Originally Posted By: ned
"...Settle for this at Point No Point?"

You mean settle for this everywhere. This is the start of ramp closures routinely being turned down due to denied permits. Why do you think a tribe with a ramp in it's U&A waould approve a permit. What's in it for them?

This effectively makes the Corps relinquish its federal authority on saltwater permitting, and transfers it to the Treaty share. Now a separate sovereign government will make the decisions on our rights to access federal surface waters.


Don’t take my post too seriously as I’m pissed also.
My point is there is going to need to be a lot of work done, some on the beach to accomplish that restoration project.
Wouldn’t that also possibly do harm to a U & A fishing area?
Yet not a peep on that from the group opposing the ramp.
Is that because there is another tribe supporting it?
SF


Edited by stonefish (07/30/21 10:25 AM)
_________________________
Go Dawgs!
Founding Member - 2025 Pink Plague Opposition Party
#coholivesmatter