Here is the actual conclusion from the article:

"But the study also demonstrates that hospitalization rates for COVID, as cited by journalists and policy makers, can be misleading, if not considered carefully. Clearly many patients right now are seriously ill. We also know that overcrowding of hospitals by COVID patients with even mild illness can have negative implications for patients in need of other care. At the same time, this study suggests that COVID hospitalization tallies can’t be taken as a simple measure of the prevalence of severe or even moderate disease, because they might inflate the true numbers by a factor of two. “As we look to shift from cases to hospitalizations as a metric to drive policy and assess level of risk to a community or state or country,” Doron told me, referring to decisions about school closures, business restrictions, mask requirements, and so on, “we should refine the definition of hospitalization. Those patients who are there with rather than from COVID don’t belong in the metric.”

So somehow the title, middle and conclusion are all missing the point of the article because you found one line in there pro-vaccine because the journalist tried to balance opinions in his article? Sounds like you are the ones cherry picking.

My point is that the libturds are wrong when they say hospitals are filling up from Covid. Instead of addressing that point, you shift gears to vaccines cut down on symptoms, which is something I've been saying all along. It's just irrelevant to the point I'm trying to make.

Sure vaccines don't stop you from getting covid, they don't stop you from spreading covid, but because they suppress some of the symptoms the vaxxers are spreading it more and putting others at risk instead of staying home and not spreading disease. I've been saying this the whole time, I don't know what your point is.

Beezus is just a fvcking moron, who misses the entire point of the my posts and the articles. So he zeros in on some irrelevant point in the article that isn't the topic of conversation, to bring up. Nobody is arguing that the vaccine doesn't suppress symptoms here you dumbfvck, so why bring it up. I didn't post the article as evidence that vaccines don't suppress the symptoms. I posted it as evidence that hospitals are not filling up with covid patients which the libturds and toad have been arguing. Are you actually this stupid or just a shill?